![]() |
medieval worlds • no. 21 • 2024
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|

medieval worlds • no. 21 • 2024, pp. 87-104, 2024/11/28
This essay endeavors to scrutinize the nuances in Einhard’s approach, probing the interplay between his role as an eyewitness and his use of rhetorical devices. The duality of his motives is notably articulated in Einhard’s prologue, as per the manuscript group (A). Einhard skillfully transforms descriptions of defeat or misfortune into commendations of virtue. Furthermore, manuscript group (B), featuring an epilogue penned by Gerward, offers valuable insights into the overarching theme of Einhard’s biography: Carolingian kingship – its rise, transmission, the imperial title and the intricacies of succession. Einhard extends beyond a mere biography and glorifies Louis the Pious, positioning him as the rightful heir and destination of the familial kingship in order to glorify Charlemagne, Louis the Pious and the Carolingian dynasty.
Keywords: biography, Charlemagne, Louis the Pious, manuscript studies, Einhard, Gerward, Carolingian kingship, historiography